Castellated vs. Cellular Beams: What’s the Difference?

Structural engineers and architects are constantly seeking innovative ways to reduce material costs without sacrificing performance. Among the various types of structural steel beams, castellated and cellular beams stand out for their unique construction and enhanced load-bearing capabilities. Though they may appear similar at first glance—both featuring perforations along their length—they serve different structural functions and come with distinct advantages and considerations. Understanding the difference between castellated vs cellular beams is vital for anyone involved in structural design, especially when efficiency, weight reduction, and load-bearing capacity are top priorities.

The Origins and Construction of Castellated Beams

Castellated beams are steel beams that have undergone a specific fabrication process to increase their depth without adding extra material. This process involves cutting a standard wide flange (WF) beam along its web in a zigzag (hexagonal) pattern. The two halves are then re-welded with a vertical offset, effectively increasing the beam’s depth by roughly 50% and creating a series of hexagonal openings along the web.

The creation of castellated beams serves multiple purposes. By increasing the depth, the moment of inertia—and hence the load-carrying capacity—of the beam is significantly improved. At the same time, the hexagonal openings reduce the beam’s overall weight and allow for easy passage of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems. This makes castellated beams particularly advantageous in commercial buildings and warehouses where clear span and integration with services are critical.

However, the design of castellated beams does come with structural challenges. The hexagonal openings, while beneficial for weight reduction and service integration, introduce stress concentrations around the corners of the cutouts. These can become potential failure points if not properly reinforced or if the beam is subjected to dynamic loading conditions. Engineers must perform detailed stress analyses to ensure that the beam will perform reliably under all anticipated loads.

Understanding Cellular Beams: Structure and Benefits

Cellular beams are essentially an evolution of castellated beams, with a major difference in the shape of the web openings. Instead of hexagonal cutouts, cellular beams feature circular openings created through a more sophisticated cutting and welding process. Typically, the process starts similarly by cutting a rolled steel section, but instead of a zigzag pattern, circular or elliptical cuts are used. The halves are then offset and welded back together, forming a deeper beam with a smooth series of circular holes along the web.

One of the most significant advantages of cellular beams lies in their round openings. Unlike the sharp corners of hexagonal cutouts, circular holes distribute stress more evenly, reducing the risk of localized stress concentrations. This gives cellular beams a performance edge when it comes to structural stability and resistance to fatigue, especially in dynamic load environments such as bridges, sports facilities, and long-span commercial buildings.

The rounded openings also offer superior aesthetic appeal, which makes cellular beams a preferred choice in architectural applications where exposed structural elements are part of the design language. Moreover, like castellated beams, the openings allow MEP services to pass through easily, preserving ceiling space and contributing to overall building efficiency.

However, these benefits come at a cost. The fabrication of cellular beams is more complex and thus more expensive than their castellated counterparts. The precision required for cutting and rejoining the circular segments demands specialized machinery and skilled labor. Additionally, while the performance gains are evident, they may not always justify the increased fabrication costs in all types of projects.

Comparing Structural Performance: Load Bearing, Deflection, and Stability

When comparing castellated vs cellular beams, structural performance is a major factor that often guides the final choice. Both types of beams aim to improve efficiency by increasing the depth and reducing weight, but their geometrical differences yield distinct performance outcomes.

In terms of load-bearing capacity, both beam types offer improved moment resistance compared to solid beams of the same weight, thanks to the increased depth. However, cellular beams generally outperform castellated beams due to their more uniform stress distribution. This translates into better resistance to lateral-torsional buckling and local buckling of the web openings.

Deflection is another critical consideration. Since cellular beams typically exhibit higher stiffness due to their smoother and more continuous web geometry, they often show lower deflection under similar loading conditions. This makes them suitable for applications with strict serviceability requirements, such as office floors or auditoriums where excessive deflection could impact occupant comfort or cause damage to finishes.

Stability under various load conditions also tends to favor cellular beams. The rounded cutouts maintain the structural continuity of the web more effectively than the angular interruptions in castellated beams. This allows for better performance under combined bending and shear forces. Nonetheless, with proper engineering and the use of reinforcing elements such as web stiffeners or doubler plates, castellated beams can also perform well in a wide range of scenarios.

Practical Applications and Cost Considerations

The choice between castellated vs cellular beams often boils down to practical application and budget constraints. Castellated beams are typically favored in industrial buildings, warehouses, and educational institutions where budget efficiency is crucial and aesthetic considerations are secondary. Their simpler fabrication process allows for quicker production and lower overall costs, making them a cost-effective solution for standard structural spans and conventional load conditions.

On the other hand, cellular beams are commonly used in architecturally exposed structures, long-span buildings, and spaces requiring higher performance or integration with building services. For example, large sports arenas, exhibition halls, and modern office complexes often feature cellular beams as part of their structural expression. Their circular openings not only provide structural advantages but also enhance the visual quality of the space.

Cost is a decisive factor in beam selection. Castellated beams are generally less expensive to produce and install, especially when standard configurations are used. Cellular beams, while more costly due to advanced fabrication, can lead to long-term savings by reducing floor-to-floor height (thanks to MEP integration), enhancing energy efficiency, and offering better performance with fewer materials in some cases.

Ultimately, engineers must weigh the project-specific requirements—such as span length, load type, integration needs, aesthetics, and budget—before selecting the appropriate beam type. The decision is rarely black and white but rather a balance of multiple design factors.

The Future of Structural Steel Design: Innovations and Sustainability

As construction trends move towards greener and more efficient building practices, both castellated and cellular beams are poised to play significant roles in the future of structural engineering. The lightweight yet strong nature of these beams contributes to material optimization, reducing the environmental footprint of steel structures. Their ability to accommodate MEP systems within their web openings further supports integrated design approaches, minimizing the need for additional ceiling or floor space and thereby improving energy efficiency.

Ongoing innovations in fabrication technology, such as automated laser cutting and robotic welding, are helping to reduce the cost and increase the precision of both beam types. These advancements are making cellular beams more accessible for a broader range of projects and encouraging hybrid solutions where both castellated and cellular designs are used in tandem for optimal performance.

In sustainable construction, where lifecycle cost and environmental impact are key considerations, these types of structural steel beams offer clear advantages. Their reduced material usage compared to traditional beams, combined with high recyclability of steel, aligns with green building certifications like LEED and BREEAM. Moreover, their versatility and adaptability to complex architectural forms make them indispensable tools for the structural designers of tomorrow.

Conclusion

As engineers and architects continue to push the boundaries of what steel can do, the debate of castellated vs cellular beams is likely to evolve—not as a matter of competition, but as a dialogue about the right tool for the right job. With enhanced modeling tools and performance-based design approaches, professionals can now tailor structural systems to meet precise goals, leveraging the unique strengths of both beam types to create safer, more beautiful, and more sustainable buildings.

Need a Steel Construction Company in Terre Haute, IN?

Benchmark Fabricated Steel is a premium service provider for all your metal and steel needs since 1971. We offer an array of services and products for commercial, business, and corporation work. Our fully trained team is available for project design, erect drawings, site construction, product procurement and delivery, engineering and consulting, and much more. Benchmark Fabricated Steel is fully accredited by the AISC and the Canadian welding association allowing for the highest quality product to be produced. Our business is also recognized by the Chamber of Commerce and is a fully certified fabricator. All of our products are manufactured by the highest quality of equipment, with an expert and knowledgeable staff. Contact us today to learn more about what we can do for you!

Categorised in: Structural Steel

This post was written by admin